Last updated: 2020-04-25

Checks: 6 1

Knit directory: Proteomics/analysis/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.6.0). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.


The R Markdown is untracked by Git. To know which version of the R Markdown file created these results, you’ll want to first commit it to the Git repo. If you’re still working on the analysis, you can ignore this warning. When you’re finished, you can run wflow_publish to commit the R Markdown file and build the HTML.

Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.

The command set.seed(20200227) was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.

Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.

Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.

Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility. The version displayed above was the version of the Git repository at the time these results were generated.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:


Ignored files:
    Ignored:    .DS_Store
    Ignored:    .Rhistory
    Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
    Ignored:    analysis/.DS_Store
    Ignored:    analysis/.Rhistory
    Ignored:    analysis/correlateGenomic_PC12adjusted_cache/
    Ignored:    analysis/correlateGenomic_cache/
    Ignored:    analysis/correlateGenomic_noBlock_MCLL_cache/
    Ignored:    analysis/correlateGenomic_noBlock_UCLL_cache/
    Ignored:    analysis/correlateGenomic_noBlock_cache/
    Ignored:    code/.Rhistory
    Ignored:    data/.DS_Store
    Ignored:    output/.DS_Store

Untracked files:
    Untracked:  analysis/analysisSplicing.Rmd
    Untracked:  analysis/analysisTrisomy19.Rmd
    Untracked:  analysis/annotateCNV.Rmd
    Untracked:  analysis/correlateGenomic_PC12adjusted.Rmd
    Untracked:  analysis/correlateGenomic_noBlock.Rmd
    Untracked:  analysis/correlateGenomic_noBlock_MCLL.Rmd
    Untracked:  analysis/correlateGenomic_noBlock_UCLL.Rmd
    Untracked:  analysis/default.css
    Untracked:  analysis/patCNV.csv
    Untracked:  analysis/patCNV.xlsx
    Untracked:  analysis/patSNV.csv
    Untracked:  analysis/peptideValidate.Rmd
    Untracked:  analysis/processPeptides_LUMOS.Rmd
    Untracked:  analysis/style.css
    Untracked:  code/utils.R
    Untracked:  data/190909_CLL_prot_abund_med_norm.tsv
    Untracked:  data/190909_CLL_prot_abund_no_norm.tsv
    Untracked:  data/20190423_Proteom_submitted_samples_bereinigt.xlsx
    Untracked:  data/20191025_Proteom_submitted_samples_final.xlsx
    Untracked:  data/LUMOS/
    Untracked:  data/LUMOS_peptides/
    Untracked:  data/LUMOS_protAnnotation.csv
    Untracked:  data/LUMOS_protAnnotation_fix.csv
    Untracked:  data/SampleAnnotation_cleaned.xlsx
    Untracked:  data/facTab_IC50atLeast3New.RData
    Untracked:  data/gmts/
    Untracked:  data/mapEnsemble.txt
    Untracked:  data/mapSymbol.txt
    Untracked:  data/pyprophet_export_aligned.csv
    Untracked:  data/timsTOF_protAnnotation.csv
    Untracked:  output/LUMOS_processed.RData
    Untracked:  output/dxdCLL.RData
    Untracked:  output/pepCLL_lumos.RData
    Untracked:  output/pepTab_lumos.RData
    Untracked:  output/proteomic_LUMOS_20200227.RData
    Untracked:  output/proteomic_LUMOS_20200320.RData
    Untracked:  output/proteomic_timsTOF_20200227.RData
    Untracked:  output/splicingResults.RData
    Untracked:  output/timsTOF_processed.RData

Unstaged changes:
    Modified:   analysis/_site.yml
    Modified:   analysis/analysisSF3B1.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/compareProteomicsRNAseq.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/correlateGenomic.Rmd
    Deleted:    analysis/correlateGenomic_removePC.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/correlateMIR.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/correlateMethylationCluster.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/index.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/predictOutcome.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/processProteomics_LUMOS.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/qualityControl_LUMOS.Rmd

Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.


There are no past versions. Publish this analysis with wflow_publish() to start tracking its development.


Proteomics data

Background of trisomy19 patients in the complete CLL cohort

tri19Tab <- filter(patMeta, diagnosis %in% "CLL") %>%
  select(Patient.ID, IGHV.status, trisomy12, trisomy19) %>%
  filter(trisomy19 %in% 1)
tri19Tab
# A tibble: 7 x 4
  Patient.ID IGHV.status trisomy12 trisomy19
  <chr>      <fct>       <fct>     <fct>    
1 P0045      M           1         1        
2 P0098      M           1         1        
3 P0494      M           1         1        
4 P0519      M           1         1        
5 P0615      M           1         1        
6 P0622      U           0         1        
7 P0648      M           1         1        

There are now 7 patients with trisomy19 in our cohort, most of them are M-CLL patients with trisomy12 One U-CLL patient, P0622, does not have trisomy12 but has trisomy19. This patients does not have FISH, WGS or WES data. The CNV status was inferred from methylation data

Transcriptomic analysis

Preprocessing data

Sample subsetting

Subset sample: select M-CLLs with annotation for trisomy12 and trisomy19

dds$IGHV <- patMeta[match(colnames(dds),patMeta$Patient.ID),]$IGHV.status
dds$trisomy12 <- patMeta[match(colnames(dds),patMeta$Patient.ID),]$trisomy12
dds$trisomy19 <- patMeta[match(colnames(dds),patMeta$Patient.ID),]$trisomy19
ddsSub <- dds[,dds$diag == "CLL" & dds$IGHV %in% "M" & !is.na(dds$trisomy12) & !is.na(dds$trisomy19)]

Summary of trisomy12 and trisomy19 status

annoTab <- tibble(patID = colnames(ddsSub),
                  tri12 = ifelse(ddsSub$trisomy12 == 1, "tri12","wt"),
                  tri19 = ifelse(ddsSub$trisomy19 ==1, "tri19","wt")) %>%
  mutate(group = ifelse(tri12 == "tri12", ifelse(tri19 == "tri19","both","onlyTri12"),"none"))
table(annoTab$tri12, annoTab$tri19)
       
        tri19 wt
  tri12     5  7
  wt        0 97

There are too many samples without either trisomy19 and trisomy12. The sample imbalance will cause bias in hypothesis testing. In addition, the other recurrent alterations in wildtype group may also complicate the problem.

To ensure the compatibility and reduce noise, in the below analysis, I will:

  1. Check the distribution of several recurrent mutations that impact gene expression (based on Almut’s paper), namely: del13q, SF3B1, del17p, TP53, del11q, BRAF, gain8q, del8p, NOTCH1, MED12, ATM.

  2. Get mutations that occurred in non-wildtype samples (with trisomy12, trisomy19 or both).

  3. Remove wild type samples that contain the recurrent mutations that do not occur in non-wildtype samples.

  4. Block for the mutations that occur in both wild type and non-wildtype samples.

#Get the distribution of recurrent mutations in RNAseq samples
patSum <- select(patMeta, Patient.ID, del13q, SF3B1, del17p, TP53, del11q, BRAF, gain8q, del8p, NOTCH1, MED12, ATM) %>%
  filter(Patient.ID %in% annoTab$patID) %>%
  gather(key = "gene",value = "status",-Patient.ID) %>%
  mutate(status = as.integer(status)) %>% filter(status %in% 1)

Which mutations occur in non-wildtype samples?

geneKeep <- unique(filter(patSum, Patient.ID %in% filter(annoTab, group != "none")$patID)$gene)
geneKeep
[1] "del13q" "SF3B1"  "del17p" "TP53"  

Remove wildtype samples with recurrent mutations except for those four: del13q, SF3B1, del17p and TP53. Those genes will be blocked when doing hypothesis test

patSum.other <- filter(patSum, !gene %in% geneKeep)
annoTab <- filter(annoTab, !(group == "none" & patID %in% patSum.other$Patient.ID))

Sample summary after filtering

table(annoTab$tri12, annoTab$tri19)
       
        tri19 wt
  tri12     5  7
  wt        0 82

Filtering transcripts

ddsSub <- ddsSub[,annoTab$patID]
ddsSub$group <- annoTab$group
geneTab <- patMeta[match(ddsSub$PatID, patMeta$Patient.ID),c("Patient.ID", "del13q","SF3B1","del17p","TP53")] %>%
  data.frame() %>% column_to_rownames("Patient.ID")
colData(ddsSub) <- cbind(colData(ddsSub),geneTab)

#filter out none protein coding genes and gene on sex chromosome
ddsSub<-ddsSub[rowData(ddsSub)$biotype %in% "protein_coding",]
ddsSub <- ddsSub[! rowData(ddsSub)$symbol %in% c("",NA),]

##vst
ddsSub.vst <- varianceStabilizingTransformation(ddsSub)
dim(ddsSub)
[1] 20074    94